The anti-energy left is cooking the books trying to show fossil fuels are responsible for thousands of deaths

Katie Tahuahua:
A recent study in the Cardiovascular Research journal trumpeted a staggering claim: According to new calculations, more than 3.6 million people died in 2015 as a result of air pollution from fossil fuels.

The problem? It’s blatantly untrue.

The scientists and media outlets perpetuating this 3.6 million myth aren’t the first to fall for the anti-fossil fuel movement’s statistical shell game. The same research tactics were used by the Environmental Protection Agency for years to inflate the impact of specific air pollutants and justify the agency’s regulatory overreach.

This study and others like it do not examine actual deaths. The results are not based on toxicology or medically verified causes of death. Instead, it’s based on a mathematical construct called “statistical lives” — a misleading number that doesn’t represent any actual human lives.

A statistical life is calculated by aggregating the additional life expectancy that is claimed to result from reducing ambient air pollutants (in this study, fine particulate matter, or PM2.5). However, these studies establish no direct evidence of causation. They calculate the reduction in risk by assuming a 100% causal relation between PM2.5 and cardiovascular and lung cancer deaths after correcting for smoking and obesity, ignoring the myriad other variables that affect health and life expectancy.

These “risk reduction” calculations are also based tenuously on the assumption that the human body cannot tolerate any level of PM2.5 — that our lungs have no natural immunity to these naturally occurring substances, even at low levels. It’s assuming that if PM2.5 causes life-threatening sickness among people in India, who suffer cruelly from smog so thick that it impairs the breathing even of healthy people, it will do so proportionately in the United States, where we have reduced PM2.5 so much that our concentrations are near natural levels.

No single human being has been identified in such studies as perishing at the hands of fossil fuels. In fact, many epidemiological studies dispute that a link exists at all between airborne particulate matter and death, while other studies note that a negative correlation exists in many cities.

In reality, fossil fuels have dramatically improved health, life expectancy, and quality of life the world over.

Thanks to the availability of affordable, reliable energy, people in the developed world enjoy remarkable comfort and health, economic mobility, education, individual liberty, long life expectancy, and freedom from the hard, menial labor of subsistence living. While academia wrings its hands about fake statistics, real men, women, and children in the developing world could be enjoying these same benefits.
...
There is much more.

Life without fossil fuels is hard and nasty.  Alternative energy is unreliable and unable to scale to meet demand.  It is also more vulnerable to extreme weather.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Police body cam video shows a difference story of what happened to George Floyd

The plot against the President

While blocking pipeline for US , Biden backs one for Taliban