Unlike lower courts, Supreme Court will follow the law on Trump's travel ban

NY Times:

Majority of Justices Signal Support for Trump’s Travel Ban

By the end of the argument, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority seemed ready to defer to President Trump’s national security judgments and discount his campaign promises to impose a “Muslim ban.”
There is nothing ambiguous about the statute Trump relied upon.  “[The president] may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

Only a liberal would read that as somehow imposing restrictions on the proclamation of a duly elected President.  But lower courts selected by Democrat forum shoppers refused to apply the statute because they did not like some of the things Trump said on the campaign trail.  Those judges are a disgrace to the rule of law.


Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Where did Uvalde shooter get the money to buy the weapons and ammo?

Comanches were brutal killers and not the gentle folks Hollywood tries to portray