The Kerry coverup exposed

 Ed Morrissey:

Zarif audio translated: No, Israel's actions weren't public domain when Kerry revealed them; UPDATE: Cruz demands resignation

 

John Kerry vehemently denied ever saying anything at all to Iran’s foreign minister about covert Israeli actions in Syria. The White House insisted, somewhat contradictorily, that Kerry had only discussed reports already in the public domain. However, a fresh translation of the leaked audio by the Washington Free Beacon shows that Mohammad Javad Zarif had no prior knowledge of Israel’s involvement in those actions:

Leaked audiotape of Iranian foreign minister Javad Zarif indicates he had no knowledge of covert Israeli military strikes before former secretary of state John Kerry provided him with the information, new details that contradict the State Department’s recent defense of Kerry.

These details are likely to further fuel calls from leading Republicans for Kerry’s firing or resignation. The New York Times reported that Zarif said on the tape that Kerry told him Israel launched 200 airstrikes against Iranian interests in Syria. The Times did not provide further details on that issue. But an independent translation of the audiotape commissioned by the Washington Free Beacon shows that Zarif went on to clarify that he had no prior knowledge of these Israeli strikes before Kerry told him.

“Kerry told me that Israel had launched 200 airstrikes against you [Iran],” said Zarif. “You didn’t know?” asked his interviewer. “No, no,” he replied.

This is the first time we’ve actually seen a quote from the tape. The New York Times’ buried lede didn’t provide any quote, but only reported that Zarif claimed to have heard about over 200 attacks from Kerry. This translated quote not only makes the meaning explicitly clear, it undermines the State Department’s “not a secret at the time” defense....

...

The left is willing to lie to protect their own and the bad deals they were responsible for.  Cruz is right that Kerry should be fired.  There should also be consideration of a criminal case against him.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility