Burris revises and extends remarks on Blagojevich contribution request

Chicago Tribune:

U.S. Sen. Roland Burris has changed his story again about what happened before ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich appointed him to the Senate, and state Republican leaders said Saturday they want an investigation into whether he perjured himself.

Burris gradually has acknowledged deeper contacts with Blagojevich allies after initially portraying himself as a surprise pick for the controversial seat the former governor is accused of trying to sell.

But Illinois House Republican leaders said they now wonder if Burris purposely deceived the public while under oath last month by not telling a special House impeachment panel that Blagojevich's brother asked for fundraising help before the now-disgraced ex-governor appointed him.

State Rep. Jim Durkin (R-Western Springs) said he would ask the now-dormant impeachment committee to refer the matter to Sangamon County State's Atty. John Schmidt, a Republican, after learning of the revelations by Burris, who is a Democrat.

Burris acknowledged the discussions with the governor's brother, Robert, in an affidavit the senator quietly filed Feb. 5 with the head of the committee.

In the affidavit, Burris said Robert Blagojevich called him three times seeking his fundraising assistance. In addition, Burris said he spoke with three other close associates of the governor and a labor leader with ties to the Blagojevich administration about being appointed to the Senate. Burris previously acknowledged only having spoken to one such friend.

...

Burris said he made the recent affidavit after reading the transcripts of his sworn testimony and realizing his answers were incomplete.

...

The new affidavit--filed only after he was sworn in Jan. 15--could damage Burris' credibility as it is now his third account of what happened behind the scenes preceding Blagojevich's decision to pick him as President Barack Obama's Senate replacement.

...
Normally it is not that unusual for a witness to read his transcript and find he may have omitted relevant information. In most cases no one would suggest impropriety. What makes this case special is that the omitted material went to the heart of the questions about the former governor and were at the heart of the case being made by the US Attorney in Chicago. Under those circumstances the omission is extraordinary. Any case brought because of the testimony will be fraught with political implications. Perjury cases are usually very difficult.

I think the issue will be a part of any campaign that Burris might try to hang onto the seat. Voters would have good reason to doubt Burris.

Comments

  1. There could be no better investment in America than to invest in energy independence.We need to utilize everything in out power to reduce our dependence on foreign oil including using our own natural resources. Create cheap clean energy,new badly needed green jobs, and reduce our dependence on foreign oil.The high cost of fuel this past year seriously damaged our economy and society. The cost of fuel effects every facet of consumer goods from production to shipping costs. After a brief reprieve gas is inching back up.OPEC will continue to cut production until they achieve their desired 80-100. per barrel. If all gasoline cars, trucks, and SUV's instead had plug-in electric drive trains, the amount of electricity needed to replace gasoline is about equal to the estimated wind energy potential of the state of North Dakota.There is a really good new book out by Jeff Wilson called The Manhattan Project of 2009 Energy Independence Now. http://www.themanhattanprojectof2009.com

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility