Patagonia will be gonia if fracking were curbed as it proposes

Houston Chronicle:
Outdoor gear manufacturer Patagonia has found itself in the cross hairs of the oil industry over its stance opposing President Donald Trump's plan to reduce the size of U.S. wilderness conservation areas.

On Tuesday morning the industry-backed activist group Texans for Natural Gas launched a social media campaign attacking the California-based company for what a spokesman described as its "hypocritical stance on fracking." The campaign includes a meme with a picture of empty shelves with the caption, "Patagonia introduces new petroleum-free product line" and an article listing, "Nine Reasons Why Patagonia Secretly Loves Fracking."

"Patagonia has every right to sell its petroleum-based products for whatever price it wants. But there's nothing principled about opposing fracking when your entire business model depends on fossil fuels," Steve Everly, a spokesman for Texans for Natural Gas, said in an email.

The group, which advocates for increased hydraulic fracturing, is funded by oil and gas companies including EnerVest, EOG Resources, and XTO Energy, a division of Exxon Mobil.

Patagonia made news in December when it sued the U.S. government to block Trump from reducing the size of the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments.
...
The anti-energy left is rife with contradictions and they are the useful idiots of Russia and OPEC with their opposition to domestic energy production.  Patagonia's product line is made with synthetic fabric based created by the petrochemical industry which relies on natural gas from fracking.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more