Dear marchers, we heard you, but think you are wrong. Using a profane child as a spokesman is a mistake

Washington Post:
‘People need to listen to us’: Crowds gather across U.S., world

Protesters from Los Angeles to London marched, held signs and chanted during “sibling marches” of the March for Our Lives rally.
The marchers are coming across as liberal fascists who want to take away people's 2nd Amendment rights.  It does not help their cause that many of the celebrities who backed this scream session are guarded by men with guns, but want to take away the guns of the rest of the people.   Even the crowd was protected by men with guns.

It is also more than ironic that some of the same people who complain about cop shootings want people to rely on the cops when they take away the personal weapons of others.  These are the same cops who utterly failed to protect the students who set off on this march.  It is also absurd to think that passing new laws on gun ownership will deter people who are not deterred by laws against murder.

The Austin bomber is further proof that irrational actors are not deterred by criminal laws.

I find the exploitation of traumatized children disgusting.  Having a child scream expletives thinking that it is persuasive is ridiculous.  Putting a homosexual girl on the stage wearing a jacket with the Cuban flag on it is lunacy.  One of the first things Castro did was round up the homosexuals and take away the people's guns before he started a mass murder campaign.  Why should we pay attention to such ignorance?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more