Posts

Showing posts with the label filibuster

Schumer accused of holding up Trump appointments

 DC Daily Journal: ... In his post, Trump blasted Schumer, dubbing him “Cryin’ Chuck” and alleging the senator demanded $2 billion in funding for the National Institutes of Health and foreign aid as a condition for approving hundreds of Trump’s nominees. “Politically embattled Senator, Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, wants the Republicans to pay, as extortion, two billion dollars in order for the radical left Democrats to approve the hundreds of Trump appointments who have been waiting for months, and are raring to go,” Trump wrote. He urged Republicans to draft legislation to break free from what he called “country-hating thugs,” emphasizing the need for swift action to counter the Democrats’ tactics. With lawmakers leaving Washington on Monday without a resolution, Senate Republicans expressed growing exasperation over Democrats’ blanket filibustering of Trump’s nominees, with only Secretary of State Marco Rubio securing a smooth confirmation. Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., signaled suppo...

Democrats no longer want to do away with filibuster

  Washington Examiner: Senate Democrats are set to rekindle their love for the very procedural tool they spent years trying to weaken : the filibuster. Soon to be in the minority, Democrats are ready to use whatever tactics are at their disposal to put up roadblocks for Republicans and President-elect Donald Trump — including the 60-vote threshold many have long sought to abolish . “I’d be lying if I said we’d be in a better position without the filibuster,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) said. “We have a responsibility to stop autocratic and long-headed abuse of power or policy, and we’ll use whatever tools we have available. We’re not going to fight this battle with one hand tied behind our back.” Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) sees the filibuster as “part of the calculation” to how Democrats will spearhead resistance next Congress in a chamber with a 53-47 GOP majority. “We had to live with it when we were in the majority,” he said. Senate Democrats under President Joe...

Biden filibusters black woman appointee of George W. Bush

 Washington Examiner: ... During former President George W. Bush's administration, then-Sen. Joe Biden twice opposed and filibustered the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in 2003 and 2005 despite her confirmation that year. Recalling the president's previous move, Republican Sen. Josh Hawley tweeted Monday Biden should "make amends" and nominate 72-year-old Brown, who retired from the D.C. Circuit in August 2017. ... Sen. Obama also opposed Brown.  It shows you what hypocrites Democrats are when it comes to judicial appointments. The Democrats should consider this opposition if they attack Republicans who oppose a liberal extremist.

Has Biden given any thought to COMPROMISE?

  W. James Antle III : Biden's dilemma: Filibuster reform or failure He is trying to push through radical Bernie Sanders agendas which have little to no support outside the liberal fever swamps of the Squad and Crazy Bernie.  His "voting rights" agenda looks like a ticket to election theft by the left.  It is also deeply unpopular outside of a few radical libs.  S super majority of voters support Voter ID including minorities yet Biden and the left insult the intelligence of minorities by calling ID's racist for voting.  At the same time, they are lushing vaccine ID cards for other things.

Fact checking Democrats

 Dan Bongino: Here's what the life of a real Democrat is really like. When Democrats are wrong, they just change their story, not caring at all that they're contradicting their original idea. It doesn't matter. Take the filibuster, for instance, this is a perfect example, right? How do the Democrats feel about the filibuster? Well, it depends, right? Lick your fingers, see where the political wind's blowing if you're a Democrat, and you'll change your mind. … So to recap again, Democrats love the filibuster, then they hate the filibuster. We're all racist for using the filibuster to suppress the minority votes or something like that. But meanwhile, they're going to use the racist filibuster to block sanctions on Vladimir Putin's oil pipeline after canceling our own Keystone pipeline months ago because they claim to care about the environment. Take a breath. I'm sure Vladimir Putin has the exact same concerns. Did you guys catch all that? Remember...

Democrats lose filibuster fight and their vote rigging agenda

Washington Examiner:   Attempt by Democrats to curb Senate filibuster falls short It was a desperate gamble by the Democrats to try to rig the 2022 elections as their best hope for staying in power.  They should be thanking Sinema and Manchin for still having the filibuster when they will be out of power.  I think their fight for changing election laws is also a reflection of how they rigged the 2020 election to sneak Biden over the finish line. 

Arizona Democrat senator rejects changing rules on filibuster

 National Review: Democratic senator Kyrsten Sinema declared Thursday that she will not vote to suspend the filibuster in order to pass two voting bills championed by her party, all but guaranteeing that President Biden’s top legislative priority will fail. Speaking on the Senate floor, Sinema reiterated her well-established commitment to preserving the filibuster and rejected the argument — made by her party leaders and Biden himself — that the rule represents an unacceptable obstacle to passing the Freedom to Vote Act and For the People Act. “There’s no need for me to restate my longstanding support for the 60-vote threshold to pass legislation. There’s no need for me to restate its role in protecting our country from wild reversals of federal policy,” she said before the chamber Thursday. “This week’s harried discussions about Senate rules are but a poor substitute for what I believe could have and should have been a thoughtful public debate at any time over the past year.” “Bu...

More evidence that voters oppose Biden and Democrats' agenda

  Washington Examiner: Majority of voters support keeping filibuster; support has grown since June: Poll It seems pretty clear that a majority of voters oppose the Biden and Democrat spending spree and see the filibuster as a way of stopping it.  See, also: Biden’s hypocritical, demagogic speech compares Manchin, Sinema to Jefferson Davis This is his ridiculous response to Democrats who oppose his spending spree.  See. also: 'In This Letter, I'll Read It': Lankford Points To Letter Signed By Harris Supporting Filibuster  

GOP game plans a response to filibuster move

 Washington Examiner: S enate Republicans say if Democrats vote to end the filibuster, the GOP will use the new rule to force votes on a string of Republican legislation that would stand a good chance of passing in the evenly divided Senate. In a move that would turn the Democratic plan to end the filibuster on its head, Republicans say they’ll bring up legislation that can easily garner 50 GOP votes and a few Democratic ones. This could advance Republican measures under the rule change Democrats are considering that would lower the 60-vote threshold to 51 votes. The GOP's list of legislation is not what Democratic leaders have in mind as they plot an end to the filibuster, including legislation to restart the Keystone XL pipeline, bolster security at the beleaguered southern border, and block taxpayer funding for abortions. “There could be some really hard votes for Democrats,” Senate Minority Whip John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, told reporters in the Capitol on Monday. ......

The Democrats' bad bet on ending the filibuster

 Kurt Schlichter: Chuck Schumer, the Inspector Clouseau of Senate Majority Leaders in comparison to Mitch McConnell’s Sherlock Holmes, has decided to try to strong-arm Joe Manchin and Kristin Sinema into dropping their opposition to killing the filibuster by making a big public show of it. Hey, that’s plan has worked great so far. I sure hope he succeeds – for once – for three reasons. Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. As so often happens with the Dems, Napoleon’s injunction to never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake comes to mind. So does Br'er Rabbit’s plea to Br'er Fox not to toss him into the briar patch. Please please please lift the filibuster, Chuck. It totally will not come back and bite you on your Swalwell valve like it did Harry Reid after he did it for circuit court judges. No, your initiative to give the incoming GOP majority and incoming GOP president unlimited power is a smart plan that will cement your reputation as a strategic genius. And don’t wo...

Desperate leftists want to block Senate filibuster

 The  Epoch Times reports that a left-wing dark money group is funding Schumer's attempt to end the Senate filibuster.  Schumer used the filibuster around 350 times to block legislation when Trump was President, but Democrats are desperate to pass a voting law that will make it easier for them to cheat.  The law they are pushing appears to unconstitutionally usurp the power given to state legislatures.  The Democrats think they need to change the law to survive the 2022 election. See, also: Devastating Polling Provides a Window Into Why Democrats Are Trying to Change the 2022 Election Rules And:  Manchin's Reluctance Leaves Democrats' Voting Rights Bill at Risk And:  Schumer shows the left's desperation to build fraud into elections And:  Democracy is not in crisis just because Democrats are losing

Democrats do not think they can win with voter integrity requirements

 National Review: Senate Majority leader Chuck Schumer announced Monday that the chamber would debate eliminating the filibuster in the coming weeks if Republicans refuse to join Democrats in passing sweeping voting legislation. While the filibuster was designed to empower the minority party in the Senate, Schumer argued that it now serves to “embarrass the will of the majority,” against the founders’ intentions for legislative procedure. He claimed that Republicans should not be allowed to block the Freedom to Vote Act, using the vehicle of the filibuster, that only further enshrines and expands the American right to vote. Schumer has previously expressed support for altering the filibuster but the statement is his strongest in favor of the idea. ... The Democrat measure is unconstitutional.  The Constitution provides that the state legislature is responsible for the voting procedures. 

Democrats continue to alienate voters

 Washington Examiner: President  Joe Biden  and congressional Democrats may have the facts on their side regarding the filibuster, but voters appear to care very little. While Biden and his Capitol Hill allies complain their legislative priorities are being impeded by Republicans and Senate rules in the 50-50 chamber, some voters are oblivious to the finer details. Polls show they simply blame Democrats for Washington's latest gridlock. HARRIS JOINS RANKS OF HEADACHE-INDUCING VICE PRESIDENTS Biden's problems started with the Jan. 5 Georgia Senate runoffs, according to Spencer Kimball, Emerson College Polling's director. Democrats clinching a majority by the slimmest of margins, with Vice President  Kamala Harris  capable of casting tiebreaking votes as the voting president of the chamber, dominated headlines, but the party falling short of a filibuster-proof 60 votes received less attention, he explained. Yes, part of the news cycle was cannibalized by the Jan. ...

The Democrats cynical attempt to ban filibuster

 Fox News: Sen. Kyrsten Sinema Monday doubled down on her defense of the Senate’s legislative filibuster , declaring in a Washington Post op-ed that it is important to stop "repeated radical reversals" of federal law . Sinema, D-Ariz., and Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., have been the two most vocal Democrats in the chamber defending the 60-vote threshold for legislation, often attracting the ire of their more liberal colleagues. And Sinema took a page from Manchin’s playbook Monday by laying out her case for the Senate’s controversial minority protection in an opinion piece. "To those who want to eliminate the legislative filibuster to pass the For the People Act (voting-rights legislation I support and have co-sponsored), I would ask: Would it be good for our country if we did, only to see that legislation rescinded a few years from now and replaced by a nationwide voter-ID law or restrictions on voting by mail in federal elections, over the objections of the minority?...