Debating David Hogg is a waste of time. He tends to respond with insults and bogus accusations of murder
Washington Post:
Laura Ingraham doesn’t really want to debate David HoggHogg is not worthy of a debate. He thinks insults are valid arguments and also is inclined to make bogus assertions of guilt toward those who had nothing to do with the crime. You can't have an intelligent exchange of ideas with someone like that. It is like arguing with a drunk in a bar.
One reason for the Fox News host's decision to mock the Parkland shooting survivor could be that she wants to remove Hogg from a national conversation about gun control. Rather than debate him, she would prefer to disqualify him.
Comments
Post a Comment