Kamala Harris ignores Rio Grande Valley hardest hit by Biden's disastrous immigration policies

 Red States:

...


In other words, she’s not really trying to get answers. If she was, she’d be talking to him and visiting where the problem really is, in his district. She hasn’t talked to him or other local people. She hasn’t even spoken to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. She just wants the issue to go away so people can stop criticizing her over it.

Now, as we previously reported, when Kamala was on her trip to Guatemala and Mexico, she said that if you want to fix a problem, you have to go to where the problem is and listen to the people.

“I almost believe that if you want to fix a problem, you have to go where the problem exists,” Harris declares. “If you want to address the needs of a people, you must meet those people. You must spend time with those people. Because the only way to fix the problem, is to understand the problem.”

She went to Guatemala and the president there told her the massive influx at the border was due to the Biden/Harris policies. She doesn’t want to go to the Rio Grande because the people there will say the same thing. Not to mention, then the media following her will see how bad the problem really is. She wants to pick the area that’s in better condition so it doesn’t look as problematic for the media.

...

She is still hiding from the main problem she and Biden have created on the border.  She is not going where Valley residents have been hurt the most by those policies.  She is not going to see the ranchers and farmers whose property has been destroyed by the illegals. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more