Biden's Iran policy makes zero sense

 Fred Fleitz:

By asking for a guarantee that U.S. will not withdraw from JCPOA, Iran’s leaders may keep U.S. out of this terrible deal.

Negotiations are said to be going well in Vienna to get the U.S. to rejoin the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran (the JCPOA) and convince Iran to reverse steps it took to back out of the agreement in response to former President Trump’s 2018 withdrawal. They could result in an agreement this summer.

Not only will such an agreement reinstate the deeply flawed Obama-era deal, without holding Iran accountable for cheating on its commitments. Any terms will provide the ayatollahs with a huge financial windfall worth over $150 billion when President Biden lifts the more than 2,000 sanctions that Mr. Trump imposed on the regime. Tehran is certain to spend these funds just like it did with the $150 billion in sanctions relief it received as part of the JCPOA in 2016: increasing its military budget, support of terrorist proxies, and meddling in regional crises.

Making this worse, Iran’s President-elect Ebrahim Raisi confirmed this week that Iran will not agree to the Biden administration’s proposed “Phase Two” talks that would follow a U.S. return to the JCPOA, the purpose of which would be to strengthen the nuclear deal, and address Iran’s missile program as well as its destabilizing activities in the Middle East and support for terrorism.

...

The original deal was one of the dumbest deals in the history of deals and getting back into it is even dumber.  It never made any sense and if we do get back into the deal it is likely to lead to war in the Middle East as countries threatened by Iran look to preempt Iran's nuclear bomb-making ability.  They are not going to agree to Iran's genocidal ambitions.  They are not going to rely on Biden's vain promises.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more