Liberal fascism with corporate sponsors

 Red States:

How did Tim Cook get suckered into becoming a TV spokesperson for Vigilante Fascism? It just doesn’t seem like something the head of a large public company should do. At least, not in the United States. Yet as RedState’s Mike Miller reported yesterday, here is Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple, looking all of us right in the eye on Fox News Sunday, condescendingly trying to sell us a patently false story about why his company has volunteered to perform law enforcement services of the sort people associate with tyrannical governments.

To hear Cook tell it, Apple removed the Parler app from the choices available to iPhone users because, “We looked at the incitement to violence that was on there, and we, we don’t consider that free speech and incitement to violence has an, has an intersection,” Cook said.

We should care about this for three reasons.

The first is that the kind of confluence that we see here between the state and the corporate sector is the primary characteristic of Fascism. Having it happen, right before our eyes, in the United States of America, should set off the loudest of alarms. Under no circumstances should private entities be taking it upon themselves to enforce the law in pursuit of public safety. If there are people openly plotting insurrections or advocating violent actions, that is a job for the FBI. In our system, the law enforcement machinery is entrusted to people we elect and can replace. It is not the task of self-anointed corporate managers who give us a song-and-dance about how they are crusaders for Truth and Justice.

The second reason is that the action taken — deeming certain speech “not free speech” — is characteristic of tyrants and tyrannical governments. Here is the head of a private company, on national television, telling us that “we don’t consider that free speech.” Tim Cook can ‘consider’ anything he likes, but when he starts using his shareholders’ assets to shut people up because he doesn’t like what they are saying, something has gone seriously awry. In claiming that he is saving us from violent seditionists, he is engaging in law enforcement… something no one anywhere authorized him or his company to do.

And finally, this should concern us because he is lying to us. Here is the head of the fourth-largest corporation in the United States telling us that his company is engaged in self-appointed, do-gooder vigilante law enforcement, and the reason he gives us is patently, obviously, a dodge. Every social media platform is riddled with posts that advocate violence. Just yesterday, famous gay-basher Alec Baldwin had a dream — not on Parler but on Twitter — about Donald Trump being hung by the neck until dead. His post is still there.
...

Has Tim Cook removed the Twitter app from Apple products? No. Yet Twitter is rife with posts like that. It seems that “advocating violence” only matters when it appears on Parler. It’s an excuse Cook gives us for what is essentially a political act motivated by political concerns. So long as the person advocating violence shares Cook’s politics, Cook does nothing. When he disagrees with the politics, he metes out punishment in the form of economic damage without benefit of trial or due process of any kind. He has arrogated unto himself the powers of judge, jury, and executioner. He is wielding the powers of a state, with zero justification for doing so except his own inflated sense of importance that deems him some sort of Savior of Humanity. The nerve. The incredible nerve.
...

Besides Twitter, his other partner in the attack on Parler is Amazon which is still selling shirts that say "Kill all Republicans."  This move was not about violence are they would have banned Twitter and Amazon.  It was about silencing the President of the United States who was complaining about alleged vote fraud.