The scientist who can't be trusted when it comes to global warming
Daily Mail:
If these people are so sure of their conclusions why do they have to cheat? Why do they have to cook the books? This has the makings of one of the most expensive frauds in the history of the world. Some who push this agenda say it is their goal to destroy capitalism, and turn the world economy over to control freak dictators. We say who that worked out for the former Soviet Union and is working ut now for Venezuela.
No wonder people are skeptical about their conclusions and intentions.
They were duped – and so were we. That was the conclusion of last week’s damning revelation that world leaders signed the Paris Agreement on climate change under the sway of unverified and questionable data.There is more.
A landmark scientific paper –the one that caused a sensation by claiming there has been NO slowdown in global warming since 2000 – was critically flawed. And thanks to the bravery of a whistleblower, we now know that for a fact.
The response has been extraordinary, with The Mail on Sunday’s disclosures reverberating around the world. There have been nearly 150,000 Facebook ‘shares’ since last Sunday, an astonishing number for a technically detailed piece, and extensive coverage in media at home and abroad.
It has even triggered an inquiry by Congress. Lamar Smith, the Texas Republican who chairs the House of Representatives’ science committee, is renewing demands for documents about the controversial paper, which was produced by America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the world’s leading source of climate data.
In his view, the whistleblower had shown that ‘NOAA cheated and got caught’. No wonder Smith and many others are concerned: the revelations go to the very heart of the climate change industry and the scientific claims we are told we can trust.
Remember, the 2015 Paris Agreement imposes gigantic burdens and its effects are felt on every household in the country. Emissions pledges made by David Cameron will cost British consumers a staggering £319 billion by 2030 – almost three times the annual budget for the NHS in England.
That is not the end of it. Taxpayers also face an additional hefty contribution to an annual £80 billion in ‘climate aid’ from advanced countries to the developing world. That is on top of our already gargantuan aid budget. Green levies and taxes already cost the average household more than £150 a year.
...
If these people are so sure of their conclusions why do they have to cheat? Why do they have to cook the books? This has the makings of one of the most expensive frauds in the history of the world. Some who push this agenda say it is their goal to destroy capitalism, and turn the world economy over to control freak dictators. We say who that worked out for the former Soviet Union and is working ut now for Venezuela.
No wonder people are skeptical about their conclusions and intentions.
Comments
Post a Comment