It is hard to trust 'experts' who have been so wrong so often
NY Times:
If the experts were right the doctor currently being treated for Ebola in New York should not have past the test at the airport. If they were right New York would not have had to scramble to notify all the people he came in contact with.
As for science, it is a scientific fact that keeping people exposed to the virus quarantined for 21 days after exposure means fewer people will be put at risk in spreading the viral disease.
If the experts were right we should not have had to nurses come down with Ebola after treating a patient. If the experts were right we should not have had to scramble to notify hundreds of people who had been exposed to one of those nurses.Alarmed by Ebola, Public Isn’t Calmed by ‘Experts Say’
Shifting guidelines on how to handle Ebola, combined with a mistrust of elites, have fed the public’s mistrust of assurances by government officials and scientists.
If the experts were right the doctor currently being treated for Ebola in New York should not have past the test at the airport. If they were right New York would not have had to scramble to notify all the people he came in contact with.
As for science, it is a scientific fact that keeping people exposed to the virus quarantined for 21 days after exposure means fewer people will be put at risk in spreading the viral disease.
Comments
Post a Comment