Harris has trouble in interview with reporter that appeared to support her

 NY Post:

How utterly vapid is VP Kamala Harris?

She just flunked an interview with a “journalist” who’d announced days before that demanding to know where the veep actually stands on policy is as unreasonable as wanting to live in a state of nirvana.

Under mild questioning from MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle, Harris still managed to flop and flail and word-salad her way into ever greater depths of inanity.

Consider this sample exchange on the subject of how Harris will pay for her estimated $1.7 trillion spending plan:

“If you can’t raise corporate taxes, or if the GOP takes control of the Senate, where do you get the money to do that? Do you still go for those plans and borrow,” asked Ruhle.

A key question, one that every candidate should have a detailed answer ready for.

Harris’ response: “Well, but we’re going to have to raise corporate taxes.”

Ruhle let this nonsense pass with zero meaningful probing.

But things somehow got even more sycophantic from there: Ruhle simpered, “You have laid out policy in great detail.”

To which Harris gave an utterly mendacious “Yes.”

That’s literally the one thing Harris hasn’t done — including in the interview Ruhle was conducting at the time, the first solo interview the candidate has given a major network so far.

Kim Jong Un could only hope to be so adored by his pet media.

Underlying the interview was the new, all-too-popular journalistic “principle” Ruhle had voided before Harris reached out for the sitdown: There’s no need for specifics from Harris because Orange Man Bad.

This approach got Joe Biden into office in the 2020 election, and most of the press clearly wants to run the same playbook again.

This time for a candidate who is either totally vacuous on actual policy, or who knows that what she really believes would turn off voters so much, she has to obfuscate.
...

Her pick for Vice President Tim Walz is probably the only candidate in this race worse than Harris.  Instead of the Harris word salads, Walz just lies a lot.  I find it amazing that this ticket is even more competitive.  I suspect that it gets there because of the irrational Trump hatred of most Democrats.  That is despite Trump having a much better record than the Biden-Harris regime.

See also:

Kamala Appears Confused When Asked How She’ll Pay for Her Policies

'It's complicated, right?'

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more