Democrats continue lawfare operations against Trump rather than campaigning on the issues

 DC Daily Journal:

...

The law-fare being waged against Donald Trump (as well as any other enemy of the Democrat Party now, like RFK Jr.) has been a major tactic of the Democrat Party in trying to prevent him from winning a second term in the White House fair and square. The law-fare helps them reach their radical base with character smears of Donald Trump, but more importantly, it forces Donald Trump and his campaign to spend time, money, and resources in court rather than on the campaign trail.

Well, they’re back at the drawing board coming up with a new legal attack on Donald Trump. This time, they want him arrested for the most insane, and frankly silly reason you won’t believe. Donald Trump’s crime? Bringing up Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio in the debate against Kamala Harris.

That’s right. According to reports, an organization that is funded by the George Soros Open Society, The Haitian Bridge Alliance, is filing lawsuits against Donald Trump because of his comments about Springfield, Ohio. They note they want Donald Trump and J.D. Vance arrested for speaking out.

The Haitian Bridge Alliance, represented by the Cleveland-based Chandra Law Firm, filed criminal charges against Trump and Ohio GOP Senator J.D. Vance on Tuesday. The charges, filed in Ohio’s Clark County Municipal Court, include accusations of false alarms, public service disruption, telecommunications harassment, and aggravated menacing.

The group is utilizing an Ohio law that permits private citizens to file criminal charges, according to the law firm. Subodh Chandra, lead counsel for the lawsuit, stated, “The Haitian community is suffering in fear because of Trump and Vance’s relentless, irresponsible, false alarms, and public services have been disrupted.”

He added, “Anyone else who wreaked havoc the way they did would have been arrested by now.” Of course, Donald Trump did not do anything other than say something that had gone viral on the internet leading up to the debate.
...

This suit suggests that the plaintiffs think that illegal aliens have a right not to be criticized for coming to the US illegally.  Their argument is essentially that US immigration laws can be ignored by groups they support and further suggests that the First Amendment is not available to critics of illegal immigration.  The Democrats apparently support this illegal immigration flooding the country in hopes that they can import a Democrat majority to support their unpopular policies.

See also:

Elon Musk

🚨🚨WHOA!!! Kamala Harris calls for mass amnesty for the millions of illegals she and Joe Biden allowed to invade America.

KAMALA: "We need a comprehensive plan that includes what we need to do to fortify not only our border, but deal with the fact that we also need to create

...


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more