Biden vs. Biden on debt ceiling

 Washington Examiner:

"How can you explain the fact that grown men and women are unwilling to budge up till now, and still some of them are still unwilling to budge, by taking an absolute position: my way or no way," said then-Vice President Joe Biden about the debt ceiling fight in 2011. "That's not governing. That's no way to govern. You can't govern that way."

What a difference a decade or so makes. This is exactly Biden's absolutist governing position on today's debt limit debate. The White House said debt ceiling talks are an "absolute nonstarter" for Biden, who claims it's "mind-boggling" to risk default. As a senator, however, Biden voted 10 times against raising the debt limit under Republican presidents. This type of hypocrisy is why people hate Washington.

Fortunately, House Republicans' Limit, Save, Grow Act, announced this week, proposes introducing a modicum of fiscal sanity to the reckless spending of recent years. The plan would aim to save $4.5 trillion over 10 years by returning discretionary federal spending to 2022 levels and limiting annual spending increases to 1%. It would rein in the IRS by cutting the $71 billion Democrats spent to double the agency's size last year. And it would make a series of pro-growth reforms to bring small businesses and the economy back. It doesn't touch Social Security.
...

Voting against Democrats is the best way to return the country to fiscal sanity.  

See, also:

Biden needs to compromise on debt ceiling. Otherwise, we're all headed toward disaster.

The U.S. could default on its debt – something that’s never happened before – as soon as June if a deal isn’t reached.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more