Perry supports lifting of oil export ban

Fuel Fix:
Former Gov. Rick Perry on Tuesday gave his support to lifting a decades-old ban on crude exports, calling it a “major error” to prevent U.S. oil from being shipped overseas.

Perry, a likely candidate for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, said that if he won the White House, he would propel North America into the global energy business “in a big way.”

“If energy is going to be used as a weapon, we need to have the largest arsenal,” Perry said at the discussion hosted by Bloomberg at the JW Marriott in downtown Houston on Tuesday.

Most crude exports have been banned under laws that arose during Middle East oil embargoes in the 1970s that led to gasoline shortages in the United States.

Crude prices have tumbled dramatically in recent months after the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries refused to slash production in the face of growing global supplies, leading to an imbalance that has loaded the nation’s storage tanks with oil and forced down prices further.

With U.S. production still ticking up, the price plunge has intensified oil companies’ drive to end the 40-year-old ban as they seek to sell their oil on the global marketplace.

Perry on Tuesday characterized OPEC’s refusal to stop pumping oil as an attempt to undercut the Russian and Iranian economies and test the resilience of the U.S. shale boom.

“The OPEC nations would like to strangle these countries that are not friendly to them and obviously send a little message to the U.S. as well,” he said. “I don’t think they are going to be successful.”
...
OPEC is worried about market share more than pricing.  It has the dilemma of losing market share if it cuts production to raise prices.  Lifting the export ban would put further pressure on OPEC and would also cut into the Iranian and Russia market share.   The US should immediately lift the export ban and also repeal the Jones Act which makes it more expensive to transport oil from one US port to another.

I disagree with those who do not think lifting the ban is a priority.  If you are thinking strategically as well as domestic energy policy it is the right thing to do.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more