Independents favored Trump during debate with Harris

 PJ Media:

...

When it came to the most important issues of the election, such as the economy or rising crime associated with illegal immigrants, the yellow line representing independent voters surged dramatically in Trump’s favor, aligning closely with the red line for Republicans. And when Kamala Harris attacked Trump, the independent voters responded negatively, once again tracking closely with Republican voters on the panel.

"I was really, really surprised because the intensity of the independent support was there for Donald Trump, and I didn't expect it," Lee Carter, pollster and president of Maslansky + Partners, said Wednesday on "The Faulkner Focus."

"Independents are tracking very much with Republicans. They're looking for a couple of things. They're looking for answers on immigration. They're looking for answers on the economy. They want to hear that things will get better for them, and they also want change from what is happening right now," she continued. "One of the most important things they were looking for last night from Kamala Harris is how are you going to make it different?"

An independent voter from New York highlighted the visible effects of the migrant crisis in the city. He criticized Kamala Harris for not defending the administration's policies on the issue, suggesting that the lack of defense was because "it's indefensible, so she pivoted."

Carter noted that independents shared Republican concerns on topics like fracking, abortion, and the economy.
...

This is consistent with other polling showing that the Biden-Harris open borders policy is a loser.  The Democrats are pursuing that border policy in hopes of importing millions of illegals and getting them to vote for them.  It would be a near-permanent rigging of US elections.  The polls show more support for Trump's immigration issues.

See also:

Debate Monitors Deliver Great News for Trump With Independents, Devastating News for Harris

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more