The burden of student debt restructuring should also include the universities that encouraged it

NY Times:

Making Sense of the 2 Candidates’ Plans on Student Debt


The challenge of making college affordable is front and center in the election. Donald J. Trump and Hillary Clinton’s philosophies of government shape their approaches to reducing the burden.
These institutions became predatory lenders so that the administrators and certain members of the faculty could live like the one percent while they exploited the most unsophisticated of borrowers.  If one of the plans is to reduce the debt of the students, then the institution should share with the government the decrease.

There is just no excuse for the confiscatory price increases at these schools that go well above the inflation rate when they are overcompensating, administrators and teachers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more