The Harris campaign's politics of fraud

 Jeff Charles:

Vice President Kamala Harris’ team has already shown that it might become one of the most dishonest campaigns in recent history. The candidate’s campaign has already told a myriad of whoppers about its political opponents, but the latest might just be one of the most egregious.

X account Kamala’s Wins posted a video on Saturday with a video of an interview with Republican vice presidential candidate Senator JD Vance (R-OH). In the post, the account claimed Vance “completely endorses Project 2025” in the video.
...

What was missing from Vance’s comments was any mention of Project 2025, which has become the left’s new bugaboo over recent months, a fact that conservative commentator Ben Domenech, who conducted the interview, quickly pointed out. Even further, this conversation took place in 2021, before Project 2025 was ever created....

This latest lie appears to be part of Team Harris’ overall strategy which involves deceptively fearmongering about Project 2025 ad nauseam, according to the Daily Signal. Indeed, Harris’ campaign essentially admitted that this is an integral part of the vice president’s strategy.

A campaign official essentially confessed that her team is deliberately misleading voters by branding all of Trump’s policies as “Project 2025.” The deceitful nature of the approach was apparently so egregious that even CNN has fact-checked Harris’ ridiculous claims.
...

I have seen no evidence that Trump or Vance has anything to do with Project 2025.  It appears to be something that Democrats have conjured up to attack Republicans. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more