Democrats have become the pro-Hamas party

 NY Post:

Democrats yet again will show their disdain for Israel when they boycott Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to Congress on Wednesday.

Consider them the pro-Hamas party.

Vice President Kamala Harris, who is supposed to preside over the Senate, claims she has a scheduling conflict and won’t attend.

Her next-in-line to preside, Senate President Pro Tempore Patty Murray (D-Wash.), is skipping, too.

Indeed, as many as 100 other Democrats are expected to thumb their noses at the leader of the Jewish state.

Never mind that it’s a key ally and the only truly democracy in the Mideast.

Nor that it’s fighting for its survival against Islamic madmen in Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen and Iran — and trying to rescue eight US hostages, including the bodies of three who died in the terrorists’ hands.

Ex-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says the invitation to Bibi was “wrong.”

She loves Israel, she insists, but Netanyahu is standing in the way of a “two-state solution,” i.e., the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel. He needs to do “what is right” for the Jewish state — or resign.

What bull.
...

It looks like the Democrats are pandering to the anti-semites in their party.  It is more than passing strange that some Democrats say that Israel is genocidal when actually Hamas is openly saying it wants to kill all the Jews in Israel.  The destruction of Hamas is no more genocidal than the allies destruction of the Nazis in World War II.  Israel is not targeting Palestinians who are not associated with the Hamas mass murders.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more