You think?
NY Times:
They really went out on a limb with this analysis. The evidence suggest there was no site security and the people hired to protect our consulate and staff were to be charitable, not up to the job. The person responsible for seeing that we had adequate security for our facility and staff is yet to be identified in any headline anyway. Congress may have to demand that name and call the person as a witness in order to find the depth of the screw up.U.S. May Have Put Mistaken Faith in Libya Site’s Security
Defenses at the American mission in Benghazi have become a major issue as the Obama administration struggles to explain what happened there and how Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens ended up alone.
Comments
Post a Comment