The media should be upset with Mueller's attack on a decision whether or not to publish

Washington Post:
Trump once wanted the National Enquirer to win a Pulitzer. Now it may prove his downfall.

The cozy relationship between the tabloid and President Trump imploded last week as federal prosecutors gave its publisher legal immunity in exchange for his cooperation in their investigation of Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen.
If having cozy relationships were a problem for the media most of the liberals in that business would be in deep trouble because of the relationship with Trump haters.   They have been fed one misleading story after another on Russian collusion and other so-called Trump exposes.  In today's Post is a story that the media got wrong about Trump's lack of prior knowledge about a Trump Tower meeting.  That is just the latest of backtracking of misleading stories about the President who appears to be a subject of a deep hatred of many at the Post.

That being said, the 1st Amendment gives the media the right to make decisions about what they publish and do not publish and one should not need Robert Mueller's approval to make those decisions either way.  No publisher should need immunity for decisions made when it comes to publication.  Would the Post want to be challenged by a prosecutor for burying a story that would hurt a liberal Democrat?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more