The FBI's Biden protection racket

 Mike Miller:

...

On July 20, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released an unclassified FBI FD-1023 form alleging that then Vice President Joe Biden “engaged in a criminal bribery scheme.” On July 23, House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said the committee continues to receive bank records, including evidence that “Joe Biden has been selling access to our enemies for decades — long before [Hunter] was involved.”

And now House Speaker Kevin McCarthy says the case that Biden accepted bribes and funneled money through a variety of shell companies “is rising to the level of [an] impeachment inquiry.”

So where does the FBI stand in this whole mess? Let’s go to George Washington University Law School legal scholar Jonathan Turley for the answer:

It increasingly seems like the FBI is the place where evidence goes to die.

Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray were unavailable for comment.

...

It is more than passing strange that the FBI does not seem interested in prosecuting some Democrats for what looks like high crimes. 

See, also:

Bombshell: Former Top Joe Biden Aide and Hunter Biden Confidant Was Working for David Weiss During the Hunter Biden Probe


And:

 McCarthy: GOP’s Biden probes ‘rising to the level of impeachment inquiry’

His comments to Sean Hannity mark the furthest he’s gone on a potential impeachment inquiry.

And:

 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Calls for Probe into Joe Biden for Alleged Bribes, Changing His Tune

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more