EU is a threat to sovereignty in dealing with refgugees

BBC:

The EU's top court has rejected a challenge by Hungary and Slovakia to a migrant relocation deal drawn up at the height of the crisis in 2015.

The European Court of Justice overruled their objections to the compulsory fixed-quota scheme.

Hungary has not accepted a single asylum seeker since the measures were introduced two years ago.

They were an attempt to ease the pressure on frontline countries such as Greece and Italy.

But the ruling has sparked fury, with Hungary's foreign minister vowing: "The real fight starts now."

Since 2014, about 1.7 million migrants have tried to make new homes in the EU - and the numbers peaked in 2015.

In September that year, European leaders agreed to spread a total of 160,000 asylum seekers among member states over two years.

Hungary, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Romania voted against the quotas.

The issue was decided by a majority vote - usually followed on issues that do not affect national sovereignty.

Hungary was asked to take 1,294 asylum seekers, Slovakia 802.

To date, Hungary has refused to take a single asylum seeker, while Slovakia has accepted only about a dozen.

Only 28,000 people have actually been relocated under the scheme.
...

The EU court is notorious for bad judgment.  It has forced the UK to keep terrorist and not deport them which costs the governments millions to house and provide for people who want to destroy the culture.  In this case, they are forcing governments to take people who may also be at war with their culture.  It is now safer to be unassociated with the EU than to live under the tyranny of the courts "human rights wackos."