UN resolution against Israel shows that Obama and Kerry not an honest broker in the peace process

Washington Post:
Netanyahu: U.N. resolution part of ‘old-world bias against Israel’

Benjamin Netanyahu expressed optimism that the world order is about to change, especially with Donald Trump’s inauguration on the horizon. The prime minister said Israel will fight to cancel the resolution condemning settlement activity.
Besides showing they are not an honest broker, it also demonstrates they failed to comprehend what is behind the Palestinian intransigence.  The Palestinians do not have a leader strong enough to make the compromises needed to get a deal.  That is why they keep on demanding unrealistic preconditions to negotiation.  If the current leadership reached a deal it would likely result in their death sentence as the terrorists who make up a significant portion of their population would turn their fury on them.

When you get right down to it, the Palestinians have nothing of value to offer the Israelis.  They can't deliver on peace because too many of the Palestinians do not want it at all.  They are Islamic religious bigots who also have an ethnic hatred of Jews that goes back to the Koran.  They have never forgiven the Jews for rejecting what the Jews believe to be a false prophet.

I do not think Obama or Kerry have a clue about the history that goes back well beyond 1948.  I suspect that both of them did poorly in history classes if they bothered to take any.  They are buying into the Islamist-leftist dogma about the history of the area.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more