Putin threatens to attack NATO

 National Review:

Russian president Vladimir Putin on Thursday threatened Western nations with the prospect of nuclear war, saying Moscow has the ability to strike “targets on their territory” if they continue supporting Ukraine.

“(Western nations) must realize that we also have weapons that can hit targets on their territory,” Putin said during his annual State of the Nation address to the Russian parliament. “All this really threatens a conflict with the use of nuclear weapons and the destruction of civilization. Don’t they get that?!”

Putin’s warning comes after European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen suggested using frozen Russian assets to fund the Ukrainian war effort. In a Wednesday speech, she said there is “no stronger symbol and no greater use” for the Russian profits than to buy military equipment for Ukraine.

Days before, French president Emmanuel Macron said sending Western troops to Ukraine through NATO should not be “ruled out.” This idea has been rejected by Western allies such as Germany and the U.K., and NATO said there are currently “no plans” to deploy ground troops in Ukraine.

“Nothing should be ruled out,” Macron said Monday. “We will do anything we can to prevent Russia from winning this war.”

In response to such statements, Putin emphasized that Russia’s “strategic nuclear forces are in a state of full readiness.” The country has been developing and testing new-generation hypersonic nuclear weapons since 2018, an undertaking that its leader had said is near completion. Some of the missiles have already been deployed, he added.

Putin also warned the West of “tragic consequences” if troops invade Russia, ignoring past failed invasions from Nazi Germany’s Adolf Hitler and France’s Napoleon Bonaparte.

“But now the consequences will be far more tragic,” Putin said. “They think it (war) is a cartoon.”

Notably, his annual address comes two weeks before the Russian presidential election over the weekend of March 15-17, which will give Putin another six-year term.
...

It is unlikely that NATO would send its troops into Russia if Russia attacks.  NATO will use its missile defense operations to thwart a Russian attack and respond with missile attacks on strategic Russia targets. The Russian attacks on Ukraine have already exposed the weakness of the Russian military as well as the lack of internal Russian support for such a war.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more