Democrats plan to cheat in Michigan, Pennsylvania?

Ned Ryun:
We cannot let the very important Supreme Court confirmation fight, brought to us by the recent passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, distract us from another, crucial fight that should command our attention before Election Day: the integrity of our elections.

We would do well to not lose sight of all the cheating that the Left is planning to do with the aim of stealing the election. They are not even being shy about their plans, just attempting to put a thin veneer of “legality” on all of it so as to make the poison go down a little smoother.

Take, for example, what took place recently in Michigan. In a case regarding mail-in ballots and deadlines (supported by none other than Marc Elias of Perkins Coie/Fusion GPS infamy, and who, we should add, is working for the Biden campaign), Michigan Court of Claims Judge Cynthia Diane Stephens decided unilaterally and arbitrarily to turn Election Day into “Election Weeks.”

That’s right: the “Honorable” Judge Stephens decided that any ballot postmarked by 5 p.m. on November 2 could be counted for up to two weeks after Election Day. In essence, what she did was legislate from the bench that ballot harvesting in Michigan is now legal.

Ballot harvesting, a practice that is rife with fraud, allows party activists to manipulate and steal votes as they go around collecting them from the various people who requested a ballot but may not have turned it in themselves.

If you think this Michigan ruling is egregious, it pales in comparison to the recent ruling in Pennsylvania that says mail-in ballots without proof of being postmarked by November 3 can still be counted. The ruling states: “Mail ballots will now be accepted if they are received by 5 p.m. on the Friday after the election and were postmarked by November 3 or there is no evidence to suggest they were sent after Election Day. Previously, mail ballots had to be received by 8pm on Election Day.” (Emphasis added.)

Let that one soak in for a hot second. By saying, “If there is no evidence to suggest they were sent after Election Day” those ballots will be deemed valid. This Pennsylvania ruling flipped the burden of proof on its head by saying ballots with no postmarks will be presumed to be valid and they have now opened the door to tons of ballots with no postmarks being shipped in after the election.

What happened to free and fair elections? One might be led to conclude that the Left is designing a system to destroy what’s left of the American Republic.

With these moves the Left greatly undermines the integrity of the vote. These rulings in Michigan and Pennsylvania annihilate free and fair elections and basically put us on the level of third-world banana republics, hellholes that just keep on counting until they get the results they want.

As Stalin famously said, he didn’t care who voted, he only cared who counted the votes.
...
The court rulings are not only absurd, but they appear to be unconstitutional by changing the date of the election.  The main reason for these decisions appears to be to allow Democrats to change the results of the election if they lose by pushing votes after the official count.  Ballots not received by election day should not be counted.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more