Carbon capture close to realistic for heavy industry?

AP/Houston Chronicle:
A technology that can capture greenhouse gases from wide swaths of the economy is gaining momentum after years of slow growth.

Carbon capture, utilization and storage projects worth $27 billion are close to a final investment decision, more than double the amount planned three years ago, the International Energy Agency said in a report.

The projects, known as CCUS, are one of the few ways heavy industries that depend on fossil fuels for energy can reduce their impact on the environment. The IEA, which advises major economies, says it’s “virtually impossible” for the world to meet targets for reducing greenhouse-gases without that technology, because industries from steel makers to cement factories have few alternatives to generate the heat they need to operate or avoid emissions from certain processes.

“CCUS will be necessary on a global scale if we are to meet the Paris Agreement,” Norway Prime Minister Erna Solberg said in a presentation of the IEA report, referring to the 2015 landmark climate treaty. “And we must start now.”

But for emissions from the energy sector to reach net zero by 2070 -- the IEA’s sustainable development scenario -- the volume of CO2 captured would have to grow by a factor of 20 by the end of this decade.

CCUS is a method of capturing carbon dioxide from smokestacks and other emitters and then injecting it underground or to use in other products. But the technology is prohibitively expensive right now, with no private company willing to take on an investment in a major project without government support, a carbon price or some form of compensation for the emissions put away.

There is some progress being made. The Norwegian government recently proposed spending 16.8 billion Norwegian krone ($1.8 billion) to back a pioneering project that will capture and store emissions from a cement factory in southern Norway owned by HeidelbergCement AG and to partially fund emissions capture for a Fortum Oyj incineration plant in Oslo. The greenhouse gas will then be liquefied and transported through pipes to a storage site underneath the North Sea. Norway’s parliament is expected to approve the spending plan later this year and construction to start.

The Norwegian facility will have more than enough capacity for the initial project. Underwater storage planned for the first phase will be able to hold 1.5 million tons of CO2 every year, much more than the 400,000 tons of the gas the cement factory produces annually. That leaves plenty of room for expansion, making it easier for other industrial sites in Europe to decide to capture their own emissions.
...
What this really shows is how unrealistic the Biden environmental plan is.  He seems clueless as to the real-world problems caused by his scheme.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains