The knuckleheads of Austin city government want to change name of city

Austin American-Statesman:
City report on Confederate monuments raises idea of renaming Austin
I normally go out of the way to avoid insulting names, but this attempt to change the name of a city is divisive and not intelligent.  My suggestion to those in the city government who don't like the name of their city is to move to one they like the name of better.  Otherwise, get busy making the city more functional instead of the dysfunctional place it has become under their administration of it.

Do something about the horrible traffic and the lack of adequate parking downtown.  We all have to learn to live with our history both the good and the bad.  We don't have to live with poor urban planning and failure to build the infrastructure needed for a city to properly function.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more