Vance kicks butt in debate with Walz

 JD Vance had a strong debate against Tim Walz and the so-called moderators at the Vice Presidential debate.

When the moderators broke the rules and tried to fact-check him, Vance fact-checked them and put them in their place.  He did this while always being polite and honest.

The facial expressions of Walz were a tell of how poorly Walz was doing.  Walz's lips throughout the debate looked like he was about to cry.

Vance ably focused on the deficiencies of Kamala Harris for the job of president. She and Walz are both some of the weakest candidates for top jobs in the US in history.

Trump-Vance will make America safer again by deporting the illegals Biden Haris have allowed into the country because of their open borders policy.  They have allowed millions of illegals into the country including thousands of murderers.  Seventy-five percent of the crimes in New York City alone have been committed by illegals.  Why would any sane person do such a thing?  I think it was because the Democrats thought these people would become Democrat voters.

See also:

A Confident J. D. Vance Keeps Tim Walz on His Heels in First and Only Vice-Presidential Debate

And:

 LIVE: JD Vance Destroying Walz in VP Debate

Walz looks scared.

And:

 Vance Confident, Walz Uneven in VP Debate Heavy on Policy

The vice-presidential debate between Republican JD Vance and Democrat Tim Walz has concluded.

And:

 REPORT: Tim Walz Lied About How Many Times He Went to China

'After weeks of searching, a spokesman finally acknowledged that Walz had traveled from the United States to China "closer to 15 times..."'

And:

 Debate Host Bias: CBS 85% Pro-Harris, 81% Anti-Trump

And:

 

Curtis Houck
@CurtisHouck
CNN's
@ScottJenningsKY
on the #VPDebate: "It's pretty clear Vance outclassed Walz tonight. I mean, I was watching this and all I could think of was -- man, Walz is so in over his head. I mean, can you imagine this guy sitting in the White House Situation Room with that facial expression that's like 50% sheer terror and 50% extreme bafflement? I mean, it was amazing the split-screen difference between a competent Vance and a totally in over his head, Walz. The answer on why he lied about his trips to China and the Tiananmen Square thing was probably the worst VP debate meltdown since Stockdale in '92, you know, 'who am I and why am I here?' It was two-and-a-half minutes of absolute terrible. For Vance, night of redemption. All the political media has told us that Vance was a terrible pick and Walz was going to bring in all these voters. That charade is now over. Walz does not belong at this level of American politics. Vance does. Final verdict? Tim Walz wandered into the wrong bar tonight."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more