The Democrats legal battle to thwart democracy

 The Federalist Wire:

...

Lawfare is probably the most important aspect of the Democrat Party machine these days. They effectively forced Robert F. Kennedy Jr. out of the primary race for the Democrat nomination for 2024. They’ve even worked overtime to make life as difficult as possible for third-party candidates like Jill Stein, suing her to prevent her from getting ballot access where they are worried about independent voters casting a ballot for anyone other than someone with a “D” next to their name.

They did the same to RFK Jr. as well. They were working furiously to keep him off of ballots when he was a strong third-party candidate, but now that he’s stepped out of the race and aligned with Donald Trump, they’ve actually worked hard to keep him on the ballots in states like Michigan. Again, as long as it hurts Donald Trump and the GOP, that’s the goal.
...

On Thursday, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) initiated a lawsuit against the Federal Election Commission (FEC) aimed at preventing Republicans from leveraging a campaign finance strategy that Democrats also utilize.

The DCCC claims that Republican joint fundraising committees are exploiting a loophole in campaign finance regulations by running attack ads under the guise of fundraising advertisements, which are permissible. Axios reported that a joint fundraising committee involving the DCCC and Democratic Michigan Senate nominee Elisa Slotkin is currently airing an attack ad against Republican Senate nominee Mike Rogers, seemingly employing the same loophole.

This legal action follows the DCCC’s unsuccessful attempts to persuade the FEC that Republicans were infringing upon campaign finance laws. The move comes amidst a backdrop where Democrats are outspending Republicans in crucial Senate races.
...

They appear not to want a fair election for their opponents. Republicans need to win these elections to save democracy in this country.

See also:

Elon Musk

@elonmusk

·Democrats are massively outspending Republicans, have almost the entire legacy & online media supporting them and almost all of Hollywood. 

And they’re still losing 🤣🤣

@ajtourville

2h

NEWS: Kamala Harris disclosed to the Federal Election Commission spending a shocking $270 million in September, largely on ads.

President Trump's spending last month totalled less than a third of that amount, coming in at only $78 million.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more