Congress criticized for another short-term funding bill

 Washington Examiner:

This week, Republican presidential candidate Chris Christie took a swipe at Congress for congratulating itself for doing the absolute minimum requirement of its job, voting to keep the government funded for two more months, while a deadlock remains on major legislation, including 12 budget bills and emergency aid to Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan.

“You look at Washington. These jokers take a victory lap for not closing the government and think, like, they deserve a big round of applause for that,” Christie said at a town hall in New Hampshire Monday. "Congratulations, you didn’t close the government you’re supposed to be down there running."

The bill signed by President Joe Biden last week keeps the federal government fully funded until Jan. 19, with the Pentagon and various other agencies extended two additional weeks until Feb. 2. Even as the Pentagon heaved a sigh of relief, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin lamented that the constant parade of continuing resolutions was doing real harm to national security.

“As we have long made clear, operating under short-term continuing resolutions hamstrings the department’s people and programs and undermines both our national security and competitiveness,” Austin said in a statement.

LOOMING 1% CUT: Last week, the Senate rejected an amendment from Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) that would have cut discretionary spending by 1%, but that could happen anyway in just six weeks.

Under terms of the Fiscal Responsibility Act, the debt ceiling compromise passed and signed into law in June, if any discretionary budget account — defense or non-defense — is still funded under a continuing resolution as of Jan. 1, a mandatory 1% reduction will be imposed until regular Fiscal 2024 appropriations measures are enacted.

...

There do not appear to be enough people willing to vote for a reasonable spending package.  I suspect the defense department would be better off with a long-term package even if it was less they preferred.  The same is probably true of other government departments.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more