Garland DOJ worst ever?

 The Lid:

There was a good reason why Senate Republicans blocked Merrick Garland from the Supreme Court at the end of Obama’s term in 2016. We can see it now: the Garland DOJ is our history’s most dangerous threat to the United States. The fact that Biden confirmed him as Attorney General is causing repercussions across the board. Never before has the Attorney General bashed the Supreme Court for removing a “right” that didn’t exist in the first place in Roe v Wade. Never before has an AG openly disagreed with a ruling that restored the right to bear arms taken away by New York.

 First, the Constitution does not now nor has it ever been involved in “reproductive rights.” That term is another word for abortion, the murder of unborn children. The wrongful decision by the Supreme Court in 1973 took that issue out of the hands of the states and put out a blanket rule for the Federal Government. The hysteria of the left over the decision yesterday reveals a complete lack of understanding of even the reason for the Constitution. The Garland DOJ is following along, saying they will push against it.

...

Whose “civil rights” are they protecting? Certainly not those of children, women, or those with firearms for self-defense. The Supreme Court is the final rule that says yea or nay to laws and situations that violate the Constitution. They don’t always do it right, they sometimes miss the mark, but they are the final rule. The Garland DOJ “disagree” with their rulings and state that they will somehow get around them is hugely concerning. The Garland DOJ is the most dangerous in history – they are weaponized against parents, ordinary people, and those with which this administration disagrees.

...

Garland seems to think his mission is pushing the evils of liberalism rather than respecting the constitution.  The sooner the Biden administration is out of office the better off Americans will be. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more