Energy obfuscation at the White House

Llewellyn King:
The most frequent practitioner of this verbal contortion is the president's press spokesman, Jay Carney. It is as though he's a magician who has promised to pull out a live rabbit from his top hat. This conjurer stands before his audience, recites some incantations and, poof, retrieves not a live rabbit from the hat but a dead chicken. 
What magician Carney does, as well as other members of the president's staff and those at the Department of Energy, is to start by talking about oil and switch to talking about "alternatives." 
The alternatives, with the exception of the nettlesome subject of biofuels (nettlesome because they produce little or no energy above what's invested in producing them), are ways of making electricity. 
The administration is adept at confusing these almost unrelated subjects. 
Oil is the stubborn problem. It affects every aspect of life and prosperity, from the balance of payments to war planning, from economic growth to our relationship with China. Worse, it may be in constrained supply for the rest of time as the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) continue to suck up the precious commodity. 
New finds and new technology relieve this gloom for a while, but as demand rises and supply struggles to adjust, that future is known - even if Washington conservative think tanks and trade groups fight the notion of structural shortage. 
The United States isn't short of electricity and has no need ever to be. 
The electricity problem, if there is one, is an environmental one. Do we continue to burn coal on a massive scale while we search for an environmental fix? Or do we go wholeheartedly for nuclear, despite the fact that the Obama administration has abandoned the Yucca Mountain waste repository in Nevada and has settled for a decision not to decide (maybe in this century) on waste disposal? 
Solar, wind, geothermal, wave power, even biomass, are technologies that come under the rubric of "alternatives" - and they're all electric technologies. 
Then there's natural gas, thought to be exhausted in the United States in the 1970s, now in abundance as a result of releasing it from shale with sophisticated technologies in drilling and hydraulic fracturing. That's another electricity fuel in abundance. 
It's enthusiasm for alternatives (a longtime love affair on the left of the Democratic Party) that has encouraged the confusing White House utterances about a policy of "all of the above." 
It's this that has spread the public perception that the president can do something about the price of gasoline. It's this that makes him vulnerable to Republican scorn over debacles like the loan guarantees to solar array manufacturer Solyndra.
... 
The White House talks about electricity because Democrats think electric cars are the answer, even though people do not want them because of their limited range and exorbitant cost.  But it is behind their backing of all the boondoggles from bankrupt solar companies to bankrupt battery manufacturers.  They have become true believers in a failed technological model.  By going all in on this failure they are also trying to strangle oil and gas at a time when Americans still need it for their transportation needs and will need it into the foreseeable future.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more