CNN panel exposes Walz buffoonery

 Red State:

...

A CNN panel was talking about the debate on Sunday. Another panelist offered that Walz was "consequential." That got commentator Scott Jennings started, as he chortled at that.

...

He said that he didn't find him "consequential." Jennings didn't hold back, "Walz is a buffoon."

... 

Jennings ripped into him. 

This guy is the only schoolteacher in America who brags that none of his students could get into an Ivy League school. He's had one consequential press interaction with our Dana Bash, who asked him about the fabrications in his own resume and his reaction was essentially "Me no understand words good." I mean he's a buffoon. He's on a free ride for running under Harris. He gets very little press. They don't let him talk to the press for a reason. 

I want one thing out of this debate. I want JD Vance to go out there and get under his skin. [Walz] has a legendary hot, short temper. A lot of governors do, but apparently he does. I want JD Vance to go out there and have him explain why he is denigrating JD Vance's story, small town America, ends up making something better out of his life, which is something we should want for every kid.

...

 Meanwhile, as Walz attacks Vance, he isn't being forthcoming about himself, as Jennings pointed out. He can't explain the stolen valor and why he has these false things in his background. And if they can't even put him out there with confidence to answer questions or do interviews -- he's just not very good. It sounds like the Harris campaign is worried about the answers he might give as well. They're already saddled with a bad enough problem with Harris' word salads. 

...

Walz should also become notorious for blaming his serial lies on "bad grammar."  This may be one of the worst tickets by a major part in history, but the Democrat machine is trying to help these mental cripples across the finish line. 

See also:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more