Is the House impeachment case so weak that Pelosi does not even want a trial?

Nick Arama:

Kim Strassel of the Wall Street Journal is making a good point about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) sitting on the articles of impeachment.

Who says that Pelosi even wants it to go to trial?

Pelosi knows that President Donald Trump is going to be exonerated in a trial because it wouldn’t be controlled by Democrats trying to game the system and they will actually expose the fact that there isn’t evidence of impeachable offenses. Not having a trial also avoids exploring the contacts between the whistleblower and House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff and/or his staff or to look into any possible Biden corruption, although Sen. Lindsey Graham has promised a separated proceeding into both anyway.

Mrs. Pelosi has understood from the start that the inevitable outcome was acquittal. There won’t be 20 Republican votes to remove Mr. Trump from office. So why hasten the president’s vindication? If the goal of this exercise all along was to damage Mr. Trump’s prospects for re-election, why wouldn’t Democrats want to hold an unconsummated impeachment over his head for as long as politically possible?

Think of it as “rolling” impeachment. Every day the Senate doesn’t hold a trial, Mrs. Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer are free to argue that the process is rigged. They are already claiming that the Senate’s Republican “jurors” have abandoned impartiality, are actively working with Mr. Trump to cover up his crimes, and are afraid to hold a trial.

Indeed, we mentioned this as her possible strategy all along in a prior article. That way she can claim Trump was impeached and not cleared because Republicans are “unfair.”

It allows her to cater to her base and say they got Trump impeached.

Of course there are a few holes in this idea as she’s now finding out. The delay doesn’t necessarily count against the Republicans, even with friendly media willing to paint them as the “unfair” ones.

The general public saw Democrats pitching Trump as an immediate threat who needed to be removed and now suddenly doesn’t. There was such an immediate need, the Democrats couldn’t wait to call some of the witnesses. Except now they want the Senate to call those witnesses they couldn’t be bothered to wait for before or it wouldn’t be “fair.” On top of that, they denied Republicans the ability to call witnesses and or present exculpatory evidence in the House. Now they’re denying Trump a fair trial in the Senate by their actions.

Even Pelosi’s own witness, Harvard Law professor, Noah Feldman, is saying that sitting on it for more than a short time is constitutionally problematic.
...

The Republicans could still call a trial without her and this would lead to Trump exoneration even if Democrats did not participate.  The Republicans could all the witnesses they were denied in the House proceeding.