Democrat candidates for President do not sound like impartial jurors when it comes to impeachment
Ed Morrissey:
There is much more.
I doubt there is a Democrat in the Senate who will be impartial in judging the President despite the obvious weakness of the case the House Democrats have made. This is clearly a partisan impeachment with zero support from Republicans.
Someone notify Notorious RBG — we have at least three cases for recusal! The question of impeachment came up as the first topic of last night’s Democratic presidential debate. PBS’ Judy Woodruff started off the show by pointing out that House Democrats “have, so far, not convinced a strong majority of Americans to support impeachment of President Trump.” Woodruff then asked all seven of the participants, “What can you say or do differently in the coming weeks to persuade more Americans that this is the right thing to do?”
Oddly enough, despite Chuck Schumer’s demand for “impartial jurors,” none of the three Senate Democrats on stage recused themselves from the question....
...
There is much more.
I doubt there is a Democrat in the Senate who will be impartial in judging the President despite the obvious weakness of the case the House Democrats have made. This is clearly a partisan impeachment with zero support from Republicans.
Comments
Post a Comment