Bloomberg wasting his money on anti-Trump ads

NY Times:

Inside the Biggest 2020 Advertising War Against Trump

Michael Bloomberg’s presidential campaign wants to flood voters with attacks on Mr. Trump before
it is too late, a lesson Republican candidates learned in 2016 when they initially ignored him.
It is already too late.  Trump supporters are not going to be moved by Bloomberg ads.  He is not going to be any more effective than the mainstream media which has been denigrating Trump for years. 

Trump supporters have already tuned out the critics.  Those critics are seen as having pushed the Russian collusion hoax and every other thing they can think of to attack the President and they have lost credibility in the process. 

The overreaction of liberals to Trump appear to be mainly a collection of their own phobias and not the reality as seen by his supporters.  They have tried to tie him to monsters of the past yet his policies have worked to lift millions out of poverty and lift all boats. 

Trump has not thrown people into gulags, but he has tried to enforce the laws that are on the books rather than ignore them the way Obama did.

Bloomberg is spending money to no effect at this point.  At best he is preaching to the resistance which is already anti-Trump and they already have other candidates who back the craziness of the resistance.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more