Democrats should keep Harry Reid
...I think Broder has a pretty good analysis of Reid's performance as Majority Leader. I hope they keep him. There is an old military axiom that holds when your adversary is making mistakes do not rush in to stop him.EDWARDS: White House and congressional Republicans really blasted Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for saying the war in Iraq is lost. Do Republicans believe it can still be won?
BRODER: Uh, Republicans, some of them believe that, and Democrats, by and large, wish that Harry Reid would learn to engage mind before mouth opens. This has become kind of a pattern for him, and, uh, I think at some point down the road the Democrats are gonna have to have a little caucus and decide how much further they want to carry Harry Reid. They’ve got able people on the Senate side, and they don’t have to put up with this kind of bumbling performance forever.
EDWARDS: You think Harry Reid is an embarrassment to the Democrats?
BRODER: I think so. I mean, he has been a pretty effective leader but he is verbally just a real loose cannon and it seems to me, Bob, that about every six weeks or so there’s another episode where he has to apologize for the way in which he has bungled the Democratic case.
His comment today suggesting Bush was in denial is another mistake on his part. As I pointed out earlier today we have a guy who has refused to get briefings from the commanders saying that a guy who gets daily briefings from commanders is in denial. I know which one which one has an informed opinion on the war.
Comments
Post a Comment