Biden's European pipeline blunder

 Lawrence Kudlow:

In a major policy blunder, Team Biden is formally giving an okay to the Russian pipeline’s last hundred miles and in so doing creates a major security threat to all of Europe and underscores the damage they have already inflicted on the American oil and gas industry. An incredible blunder.

Biden people have tried to justify the error on grounds that it would help their relationship with Germany and seek closer ties with the rest of Europe. I want to report to you that the rest of Europe opposes the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

Only Germany favored it. That’s because it would bail out Germany’s failed energy policies that first veered green and then when that failed went back to high polluting coal. Even France opposed this deal. President Macron repeatedly publicly told Frau Merkel that he opposed it.

European countries opposed it because they don’t want to let Russia impose hegemonic influence. I know the Europeans oppose this because in the Trump administration, before we put sanctions on pipeline builders and any other firm involved (which stopped construction with about 100 miles left), I and others consulted with our European counterparts. And it was clear they approved of America’s actions.

The argument that Mr. Biden is going to improve relations with our European allies is just false. Outside Germany, they’re against approving the pipeline. This creates severe doubts about the diplomatic wisdom of the current State Department and national security adviser competency. Of course, this decision leaves the Ukraine in the lurch.

Remarkably as Betsy Woodruff of Politico reports, “The U.S. asked an unhappy Ukraine not to make waves and to stay quiet on the Russian pipeline deal.” Why are we damaging Ukraine? I thought our policy was to bring them into the western orbit. Membership in the European Union. Maybe even NATO.

...

There appears to be little intelligent life inside the Biden administration especially when it comes to pipelines.  They kill a pipeline that makes America more energy secure and approves a pipeline that makes NATO less secure.  Both are lose-lose deals for the US by an administration that is supposed to be on our side. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more