Wide Receiver vs. Fast and Furious--Holder confesses the differences

...
Operation Wide Receiver is the administration’s desperate excuse/distraction from their gunrunning activities; it was a Bush-era program that was supposedly identical to Operation Fast & Furious… except that attempts were made to keep track of the guns being sold (Operation Fast & Furious did not), OWR was conducted with the awareness and cooperation of the Mexican government (OF&F was not), and – contra the earnest attempts of the Obama administration – the program ended two years before Bush left office. So, in other words, it wasn’t particularly identical to Operation Fast & Furious at all.
By the way: my source for the first two points of difference? The sworn testimony of Attorney General Eric Holder, back when Sen. John Cornyn was raking him over the coals in 2011. In the clip below, you can see Holder admitting the differences, and explicitly denying that the two operations were the same.

Unless he was, you know, lying there.
Democrats are having trouble with their own talking points.  Sen. Cornyn gets holder to admit to the differences between the programs.  It is too bad he can't get Carney and other people defending Holder under oath on the same issue, so we could stop the misleading spin.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Chicago way

The plot to kill George W. Bush

Oil prices rise in the wake of Syrian missile strike