Congress looks to restrict US oil service companies operations in Russia

 The Hill:

A bipartisan coalition of more than 50 congressional representatives called on the Biden administration to tighten sanctions on Russian oil and specifically address a major U.S. oil field servicer’s presence in Russia.

In the letter, led by Reps. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) and Jake Auchincloss (D-Mass.), the members asked Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Secretary of State Antony Blinken to restrict activity by the firm SLB in Russia after the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Since the invasion, they wrote, SLB has imported millions of dollars worth of equipment into Russia, including hydraulic packers and drilling tools. At least $3 million of the equipment SLB has imported into Russia in the final five months of 2023 falls into categories that should be subject to international controls if exported from the U.S. or Europe, they wrote.

“This U.S.-based company is keeping Vladimir Putin’s war machine well-oiled with financing for the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. We urge you to continue supporting our Ukrainian allies by pursuing more rigorous oil sanctions to effectively restrict Putin’s profits,” the members wrote. “In concert with our allies in the [Group of Seven], we must tighten oil sanctions to prevent the billions in revenue currently flowing into the Kremlin’s budget. Permitting Western investment in the oil and gas sector strengthens Russia’s wartime economy and its military strength.”

The representatives asked Yellen and Blinken to clarify whether SLB is aware of “where the guard rails are” regarding sanctions, as a State Department official has reportedly said it is.

They also questioned whether the current sanctions program is effective in its goals if it allows an arrangement where American companies can import equipment into Russia from third nations, and they requested a list of all approved exceptions to American sanctions.
...

Rep. Doggett was a classmate of mine in law school.  While I am a Republican I got along with him and thought he was a decent guy.  I can understand the concern about US energy service companies assisting Russia's exploitation of their energy resources.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more