The disgraceful Hunter Biden deal

Gregg Jarrett:

"Equal Justice Under Law" is now officially dead.

That lofty ideal chiseled on the pediment of the U.S. Supreme Court was blown to shreds with the indefensible plea deal for Hunter Biden that allows him to skate on severe criminal charges that would have landed anyone else in America behind bars. The preferential treatment for the president’s son makes a mockery of the law.

We knew it was coming. The government’s investigation had stretched for more than five long years. By itself, that was absurd. The evidence against Hunter was clear and convincing.

GOP RIPS HUNTER'S 'SWEETHEART' PLEA DEAL ON TAX AND GUN CRIMES, ZERO IN ON JOE BIDEN

He evaded taxes on millions of dollars that he pocketed from overseas sources — part of his elaborate influence-peddling schemes that leveraged access to his powerful father. He obviously lied on a gun form and broke the law when he purchased a firearm.

But President Joe Biden and his consigliere at the Justice Department, Attorney General Merrick Garland, have rewritten the criminal codes with a special exemption. A Biden can defy the law with impunity. Everyone else must abide.

There is no justifying this demolition of justice. Unequal application of the statutes is now the law of the land. Our legal system is as corrupt as the Bidens. They made it so.
...

The voters should have seen this corruption coming when they elected Joe Biden. 

See, also:

Oh, So That's Why Hunter Biden Got a Sweetheart Plea Deal When He Did

Just days after Hunter Biden reached a sweetheart plea deal with his father's Justice Department to avoid jail time for tax and gun crimes, the House Ways and Means Committee unveiled new testimony from IRS whistleblowers alleging roadblocks were set before them to ensure preferential treatment to President Joe Biden's son. What's more, whistleblower testimony claims that the U.S. attorney overseeing the probe of Hunter's alleged tax crimes had his attempts to charge hunter in 2022 denied.


Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) confirmed on Thursday that his committee had "credible whistleblower testimony alleging misconduct and government abuse that is resulting in preferential treatment" for the president's son, Hunter Biden. That testimony regarding the investigations "for tax crimes that include evading taxes on income from foreign sources," the Missouri Republican explained, could only be taken by the Ways and Means Committee.
...

The multiple whistleblowers with whom transcribed interviews were conducted revealed three key "areas of focus," according to Smith:
  1. The federal government is not treating taxpayers equally when enforcing tax laws.
  2. The Biden Department of Justice is intervening and overstepping when it comes to the investigation of the president's son.
  3. Whistleblowers report they have faced almost immediate retaliation.
...

And:

 Will the Grand Jury Fall for the Hunter Biden Theatrics?

And:

 Hunter Biden’s plea deal is proof Democrats are ‘The Untouchables’ in Joe’s America

To express disappointment in the results of the Hunter Biden probe is to admit you ever believed it was an actual and honest investigation.

Shame on you, sucker.

Santa Claus is more real than the integrity of the FBI and Justice Department under Joe Biden. Friend and family discounts have never been so obvious — and odious.
...

And:

 Whistleblowers say IRS recommended far more charges, including felonies, against Hunter Biden

And:

 The Whistle Blows on Hunter Biden’s Plea Deal

IRS agents say the Justice Department hindered their probe of the president’s son.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more