Biden accused of misusing FBI to go after parents

 American Action News:

A congressional committee investigating the Biden administration’s misuse of the FBI believes there is more evidence the White House was part of a plan to use federal agents to intimidate parents critical of their local school board.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) is demanding White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients turn over additional documents detailing the Biden Administration’s alleged “use of counterterrorism and criminal tools against parents exercising their First Amendment rights at school board meetings.”

“The letter renews the Committee’s outstanding requests for documents and communications from Mary C. Wall, a Senior Advisor to the President who served as the liaison between the White House and Executive Branch officials across multiple agencies, as well as the conduit between the White House and the National School Boards Association (NSBA),” the Committee reports.

“Although evidence shows the White House was heavily involved in the Administration’s targeting of parents, Executive Branch agencies have declined to provide any documents pertaining to the White House,” the Committee added.

Since October 2021 the Committee has issued over one hundred letters to Biden administration officials requesting documents and information on the White House’s use of federal counterterrorism resources to target, intimidate and attempt to silence average citizens who are critical of liberal policies enacted by local school boards.

In one case, FBI agents were sent to the home of a mother who announced she planned to run for her local school board against an advocate of the Biden administration’s “woke” social policiees.

“Whistleblowers have disclosed how, shortly after Attorney General Garland’s October 4 memorandum, the FBI’s Counterterrorism and Criminal Divisions created a specific “threat tag” for school board-related threats and even opened investigations into parents simply for speaking out on behalf of their children,” the Committee reports, adding “The Attorney General’s directive followed a letter from the NSBA to President Biden urging him to weaponize the Patriot Act against parents. Emails later showed how the Biden White House had advance knowledge of this letter and its contents and raised no objection.”

“On February 3, 2023, the Committee subpoenaed the FBI, Department of Justice (DOJ), and Department of Education (DOE) for documents and communications concerning the White House’s involvement in this misuse of counterterrorism and criminal tools, and so far, both DOJ and DOE have refused to provide any relevant information,” the Committee notes.
...

If the Biden administration did this it looks like a clear abuse of power.  Parents exercising their first amendment rights to protest and to put political pressure on the education establishment are not a threat to national security and this would be a clear misuse of FBI resources to go after them. 

See, also:

Dems hold their ears as Durham exposes FBI’s partisan corruption

And:

 Ohio moms react to 'vicious' school reporting them to FBI after exposing critical race theory: complaint

In response to voicing concerns about the curriculum, the Ohio school 'alerted the FBI that we were dangerous,' according to the moms

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more