Evidence of Biden corruption?

 Robert Knight:

Last Tuesday, a remarkable thing happened.

Under a split screen of photos of President Biden and former President Donald Trump, a message appeared during a Fox News story about Mr. Trump’s arraignment over documents found in the FBI’s raid on his Florida home.

In all caps, it said: “WANNABE DICTATOR SPEAKS AT THE WHITE HOUSE AFTER HAVING HIS POLITICAL RIVAL ARRESTED.”

Well, yes. What sounds like The Babylon Bee is exactly what’s happened. The Justice Department has arrested Mr. Trump because he is Mr. Biden’s main political opponent. This fits with the administration’s ongoing 30-month prosecution of more than 1,000 Trump supporters over the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

Like China, the FBI is using facial recognition technology to identify people in the crowd. They recently made an example of a TV producer. A photo shows him outside the Capitol with his face circled in ink.

As with the Hong Kong crackdowns, this is aimed at discouraging any more protests. Who wants to spend time in the D.C. jail gulag without trial for months or even years? As Mr. Trump has said, if they can do what they’re doing to me, imagine what they can do to you.

Yet someone at Fox with access to the message bar decided to blurt out the truth for 27 seconds before it was yanked. May God bless (and help) that person.

The former president could spend the rest of his life in prison if convicted. No other former president has ever received this kind of treatment over documents. The papers were not floating around but were in his home (not his garage), guarded by the Secret Service.

Mr. Trump was indicted after news broke about a “very credible” longtime FBI informant saying Mr. Biden and his son Hunter each took a $5 million Ukraine-related bribe.

Article II, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution says: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

President Biden’s disastrous obliteration of our southern border qualifies as treason. And his alleged payments from Ukraine and elsewhere would constitute bribery.

The first Trump impeachment was triggered by Hillary Clinton’s “Russian collusion” hoax, which weaponized the FBI. Nothing has ever happened to Mrs. Clinton or the other plotters.

Earlier, she faced no penalty for destroying 30,000 emails as secretary of state and smashing cellphones sought as evidence. Mrs. Clinton issued a tweet this past week. It shows her with an “I got away with it” grin and wearing a baseball cap that says, “But Her Emails.”

Yes, she is quite happy to rub this in our faces.

Still ignored by the Justice Department is the boast Mr. Biden made to a Council on Foreign Relations audience on Jan. 23, 2018.

As the video on C-SPAN reveals, Mr. Biden says that while he was vice president, he threatened then-Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko and another official to cancel a U.S. loan guarantee if Mr. Poroshenko did not fire Ukraine’s top prosecutor. That prosecutor later said he had been investigating the Burisma gas company, which paid Hunter Biden millions for being on its board:

Mr. Biden: “I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ … I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’”

“Well, son of a b——, he got fired.” The audience laughed along with him.

Later, for suggesting in a phone call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that he might want to look into Mr. Biden’s boast, Mr. Trump was impeached. This is like charging someone who witnesses a bank robbery with the crime of reporting the robbery.

We’re learning now that the Biden family has pocketed millions for influence peddling in China, Ukraine and Russia using 20 bank accounts.

The House subcommittee on the weaponization of government is churning out shocking evidence of Mr. Biden‘s graft. Good for them. But action is needed.
...

The "wannabe Dictator" was not amused by the headline, nor were the media supporters of the "wannabe Dictator."  What ios being exposed is a dual system of justice that ignores Democrat politicians and targets Republican politicians. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more