Trump explains reluctance to turnover documents to National Archives

 National Review:

Former president Donald Trump defended his handling of classified documents during an interview with Fox News that aired Monday, claiming he held onto the documents amid requests from the National Archives and Records Administration to return the materials only because he had personal items mixed in with the records and needed to go through the boxes first.

“The only way NARA could ever get this stuff, this back would be [to say] ‘Please, please, please could we have it back,’” Trump said during a sit-down interview with Bret Baier.

“They did ask for it,” Baier said.

“No, we were talking,” Trump replied.

Baier noted that NARA asked for the documents before the Department of Justice subpoenaed Trump to give back the materials, which the DOJ, in its indictment, describes as “bearing classification markings.” The DOJ’s indictment adds, “We should treat them presumptively as classified.”

Trump noted that NARA has never taken such action before with a former president. Baier asked Trump why he didn’t hand over the records.

“Because I had boxes. I want to go through the boxes and get my personal things out. I don’t want to hand that over to NARA yet. And I was very busy as you’ve sort of seen,” he said.

“Before I send boxes over, I have to take my things out,” Trump said. “These boxes were interspersed with all sorts of things,” including clothing and shoes.
...

An indictment against Trump appears to be an extreme response to the problem.  NARA should work with him on separating the material.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more