Clinton campiagn wastes time and money trying to run up Trump's negatives which are already at record levels

NY Times:

Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren Take Aim at Donald Trump

Hillary Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, and Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts at their first joint campaign rally in Cincinnati on Monday.
Hilary Swift for The New York Times
Hillary Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, and Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts at their first joint campaign rally in Cincinnati on Monday.
Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts campaigned with Hillary Clinton in Cincinnati, the first event that featured the two Democrats together.
Warren is an anti-capitalist intellectual lightweight with a history of using dubious means to qualify as an affirmative action hire at Harvard.  She was grossly overpaid for teaching one class.  She has harped on Wall Street while Hilary has been raking in money from the same people Warren attacks.

Meanwhile has the highest negatives of any candidate in history and he did it all on his own without Hillary's negative ads and Warren's insults.  Attacking Trump is like wrestling with a pig in the mud.  He will respond in kind and will enjoy more than she will.

In fact, Hillary Clinton's bigger problems are her own negatives which keep getting worse every day with new revelations about her false and misleading statements about her email and other aspects of her record.  She tends to lie when the truth would serve her better.  Her biggest advantage is a media that wants her to win despite all her glaring faults.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more