The Twitter censorship scam

 Jazz Shaw:

The ongoing panic among liberal Democrats and their mainstream media stenographers over Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter is continuing through the weekend with no signs of slowing down. Each of his new tweets is being analyzed for indications that he’s preparing to destroy the world by allowing people to post their own views and opinions without being shadow banned, deleted, or outright canceled. The clear and present danger is that people will somehow be “harmed” by viewing speech that they disagree with or find offensive.

These innocent victims must be protected, so Elon Musk must be stopped! That’s what we’ve always been told, right? “Harmful, dangerous misinformation” is a threat to anyone unfortunate enough to stumble across the website. And who does such a thing? Racists, of course. Business Insider rushed to report that “experts” found the use of the N-word rose by 500% in the first twelve hours after Musk took over.

The Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI), a research group that analyzes social media content to predict emerging threats, said that use of the N-word on Twitter increased by nearly 500% in the 12 hours immediately after Musk’s deal was finalized.

The newspaper also noted that several online trolling accounts called on others to use racist language in the aftermath of the deal.

“Elon now controls twitter. Unleash the racial slurs. K—S AND N—–S,” said one account, using slurs for Jewish and Black people, per the outlet.

Here’s a quick question for anyone who tracks this sort of thing. Was anyone tracking the use of the N-word on Twitter before Musk started circling the platform like a lurking megalodon? And who is suddenly using it? We already know that some people are allowed to say or write it while others are not. Only a couple of weeks ago, Ye (formerly known as Kanye West) tweeted at another famous person, “I thought you was my n****r?” Sadly, the tweet is now lost, but it drew a lot of buzz at the time.

But let’s get back to the actual “crime” that is taking place here and what everyone is supposed to do about it. If you’re “protecting” any other users from “harmful content,” you’re protecting some fairly clueless people who probably shouldn’t own a laptop. If you’re “protecting yourself” you clearly don’t understand how Twitter operates. You don’t have to see tweets from anyone you don’t want to. Just don’t follow them.

You don’t even have to block them or mute them. If you don’t want to read what they talk about, you won’t be aware of them if you don’t follow them. You can join Twitter and not follow anyone. Just don’t look at your mentions or replies. You can post cat pictures all day every day and never even know anyone else uses the service. (You might even do well. Pet pictures are very popular.)

But here’s the key point that needs to be made, even though all of the panicked masses attacking Elon Musk already know this, but won’t admit it. “Protecting others” was never what this was about. As I just pointed out, everyone is automatically protected if they’re not following the “dangerous” people. What these liberal censorship fans actually wanted was to make sure that nobody heard you. Not just them. Not their friends. Nobody. They wanted to silence you. That’s why they call it censorship.

...

I do not spend a lot of time on Twitter but I do look at things others post on Twitter on occasion.  That saves me the time of wading through the mostly liberal garbage that is on the site. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains