Democracy and the Democrats

 Washington Examiner:

Democratic lawyer Marc Elias violated the old maxim about never taking on those who buy ink by the barrel and ended up in a losing battle with the New York Times over the weekend.

Elias, who helped fund the discredited Trump dossier and has battled against Republican-backed election reforms, was incensed over an article about “dark money” being funneled to left-wing activists, including him. He told his 617,000 Twitter followers that the Supreme Court should “revisit” a landmark press freedoms ruling.

“If the media is not going to be pro-democracy, then it probably is time for the courts to revisit New York Times v Sullivan (as conservative lawyers suggest),” Elias tweeted on Saturday. “The case was premised on a role in democracy that the main stream press seems increasingly disinterested in playing.”

Elias, known for his funding of British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s discredited dossier while he was the top lawyer for Hillary Clinton’s presidential bid, deleted the tweet the next day, but at that point, he had picked a fight he couldn't win.

...

The dossier was an illicit attempt by the Clinton campaign and the Democrats to thwart the democratic election of Donald Trump.  That was one of the biggest political frauds in US history and it was a bad-faith attempt to try to destroy the Trump administration with a lie.  There are some Democrats who act like their party has a monopoly on democracy.

See, also:

New York Dems Are Gerrymandering GOP Districts Out of Existence

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains